nope you misunderstood me ..I got the idea from a stickymail from a fellow member here ..read the article he linked it to and then thought about how it would have to be ROI'd .. as far as I can see it has no flaws ..and legally ( depending on the link text )there is nothing you can do to stop it if it happens to you.. checking your inbounds daily might give you a heads up before you get dropped from serps ..then again how to check all inbounds .. G always lied about the number of inbounds that it used to calculate and at the moment is involved in a totally different attitude to their relevance , ranking and provenance. MSn and Y are slightly better about the actual number used .. Y is slightly better at assesing quality and actual subject of page . however the damage can be done before you know it's happening .. possibly if you are in the ODP ( hand assessed ) that might be away of appealing to the search engines if they have dropped you as a result of this..
before the cries of how dispicable etc ..there are parts of the world less than 1 mile from some of us where real lives can be bought for less than $5.oo.
some people will do anything to remove a competitor from the top slot ..technically this is a lot easier than dropping a server ..
drive by black hat
as with bombing ..the search engines can be blindly sent to do many things ..
i think jagger may be trying to deal with this amongst other issues.