2by4 - 10:48 pm on Oct 18, 2005 (gmt 0)

Yes, the 302, but I think that's actually much harder to correct than we realize, because of how 302s actually need to work. That's my impression anyway. I don't think this issue is due to any incompetence to be honest, I think it's simply very complicate to resolve, at least within the structure of the algo that has that issue.

Sort of like making Windows secure for example, easier said than done. Not to say the google OS/application layer is as bad as Windows of course.

301s I'm seeing work within days, no matter what the scale, full correction though as you noted in under 3 weeks, it really impresses me.