yoderfarms - 2:47 pm on Nov 18, 2006 (gmt 0) does anyone spot any clear violations of W3C coding on these lines? am i looking at the right lines (is it literally referring to the text file?)
does anyone spot any clear violations of W3C coding on these lines? am i looking at the right lines (is it literally referring to the text file?)
am i looking at the right lines (is it literally referring to the text file?)