Are you sure that you yourself can differentiate?
Remember that one man's "resource page" is another man's scraper site. I can think of very few resource pages that I have ever found that have been really useful to me. If I need to find information about my topic I use Google for this. This is what Google is for so why should they be concerned about the removal of your "resource pages" when they are more than capable of providing this information themselves?
My definition of a useful resource page would be a list of links within a site that point to sites on the same or related topics with a full review of the contents of the linked sites and why they may be of interest. Do your resource pages do this?