Page is a not externally linkable
tigertom - 9:29 am on Aug 6, 2005 (gmt 0)
I've read posters on WebmasterWorld saying they have sites with pages numbering in the 100,000's. If that's common, Google is doing what it's always done: use software to present the most useful results to users. Which means dumping pages, and sometimes, sites. 100,000 pages of anything can't _all_ be top-notch. They're a publicly quoted company now. Their shareholders expect returns. All they have is their SERPs, really, and lately, their brand. The heat is on. They do an update, spammers get hammered, a few legit webmasters complain, put 'em back in, tweak the algorithm again, fewer complaints, more junk 'flushed', a good day's work. That means that any page ... - That doesn't have a few good external links to it, ... is not as 'interesting' as it's opposite: - A quirky hand-made page with authoritative, unique content, with links _to_ it from independent sites. The trick for SEO is how to mimic the latter as easily as possible. (Sorry if I'm restating the obvious.) ------ 2. I got my main site back in. Not too bothered about the satellites, which I've nuked, anyway. Method: a. Removed all the content similar to that on pseudo-directory-Adsense-scraper-autogenerated-link-heavy sites b. Emailed Google, admitted what I'd done wrong, and what I'd done to correct it. Was very polite, short, and to the point; gave the full URLs of the sites involved. Made it easy for them. No waffle, no 'buts', no carping (I bet they get a lot of that). c. Got a reply 'your request has been forwarded to d. A few follow up emails about what I was doing to correct problem; again, short, polite and to the point. I skim long emails; I bet they do too. Got another email saying 'thank you for your patience', or words to that effect (subtext: stop bugging us(?)) Back in again about one week later. SERP positions seem the same. PR restored. My site is not a directory. It's an old, eclectic personal site on steriods. That probably helped. I'm going to make damn sure I don't rely on one site, or search engine, in future, for my traffic. Thanks to all on MWM that helped with their informative posts, especially (heh, heh) the Contractor.
1. To play devil's advocate:
- Has sections which are repeated elsewhere in the site, or on other sites,
- Has lots of links to other sites,
- Is autogenerated, so has flags that can be tagged
engineers'.