walkman - 1:53 am on Jun 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

>> Maybe I just misunderstand your point with this post.

the point was: just because something is "secret" (incriminating, or just embarrasing) doesn't mean we shouldn't see it, or that is illegal to print. All of the above things I mentioned were "secret".

I also included the "and thousands of other (relevant or not) internal memos from other companies" to make it clear that it doesn't have to be an illegal act. It can be a movie star's demands for the set, an embarrasing cafeteria policy for Acme Inc., and so on.

It was NOT meant to say that voelspriet is Bob Woodward, or that GoogleGuy is Nixon. ;)

[edited by: walkman at 2:08 am (utc) on June 7, 2005]