japanese - 12:19 am on Mar 7, 2005 (gmt 0)

TheBear,

Can you please elaborate on that. Seems you pointed out very little in a doctrinaire fashion, suggesting that you know about how googlebot’s algo works in great detail.

Can you provide contradictory evidence if I placed a cast iron evidence here in the next post?

How do you know about pages being involved in a redirect. Unless I am missing something here or I am a useless webmaster, I was of the opinion that a script based redirect link, such as a deadly CGI one, is a sole entity generated via a pearl serverside script when clicked by a browser or followed by a robot. A robot follows that redirect, if it finds it’s location displayed by the directive of the link, with a 200 GET, the bot can only do what the writers of the algo tell it to do. The page containing the kick off link is already a page, the hijacked page becomes an additional supplemental page. So if badguy.com had one page with the script redirects he now has 2.

Zeus is 100% correct in thinking that these scripts are harmful to unsuspecting websites. They are used too indescriminately, and by the way, html was the original linking tool, many scripts have since been invented and it is proving impossible to contain them all as a family of scripts that are in harmony.

If I imvented a scripting language, would it be assumed I helped to evolve the internet, or would it be assumed that another mess has to be cleaned up?