Filipe - 2:23 am on Aug 31, 2002 (gmt 0)

I want to thank all the moderators for keeping everyone in check. I personally don't agree with Mr. Brandt in the slightest, because I don't think he provides an organized argument that is sound, much less valid. I would like to see the argument laid out with the evidence supporting the premises, which, as current, I don't think they do so on good grounds. However, when people take things out of context (I'm guilty of it, I know) or get belligerent, we're just slowing down anything resembling a conclusion to this thread.

So all you "This guy is a @#$%@% nut" posters, I understand your position, but try not to load your argument with value judgements or else what you're trying to say just falls apart.

Interesting thread, huh?