balam - 8:34 am on Apr 30, 2004 (gmt 0)

Took a look at the site in question, and it's indeed a little unusual. But, at the same time, it doesn't really fit with what I've brought up.

It does have a freshdate and there is a "Cached" version link. I looked at the source, and there's no noarchive attribute. This page does fit my theory that only cached pages get freshdates.

So, what's unusual?

If you click on the "Cached" link, as 4crests noted, you get a blank page except for Google's standard cached page header.

All the page's HTML is still there, it just doesn't display. (Well, the <TITLE> does, but that's it.) I think it might have something to do with the fact that he built his site using frames; it's either too early or too late in the day - I'm not sure which - for me to figure out right now. :)