synergy - 10:04 pm on Mar 5, 2004 (gmt 0)

I can't see Google depreciating the value of a page named links.htm just because of the way it's named.

Most pages named links.htm have tons of irrelevant links or links piled together that are not organized. I CAN see Google depreciating a page like that. It just so happens most of these amaturish pages happen to have the name of links.htm. See the correlation?

Wouldn't it be better to divide your links up into seperate sections naming each section page on topic?

Example:

/resources/marketing.htm

Also I think a better term for "links" is "resources". Like it or not, an outgoing link should serve as a resource for your visitors.

[edited by: synergy at 10:51 pm (utc) on Mar. 5, 2004]