Clark - 1:03 am on Jul 10, 2003 (gmt 0)
I have nothing against the feature personally. I think it's cool, don't use the nocache option, G can show what they want AFAIC. But the arguments provided are valid and it is copyright infringement I tend to think and I don't see how they can get around that in a court of law. They are taking someone else's content and publishing it on their site. The burden should be on them telling you how to ALLOW them to cache your content NOT on telling you how to DISABLE it.