Page is a not externally linkable
walkman - 10:48 pm on Jan 29, 2008 (gmt 0)
(1) that the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; (2) that the respondent has no legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and (3) the domain name has been registered and used in bad faith. [domains.adrforum.com...]
you need to attack all three (by reading previous rulings you'll see what they look for) and only need to prove ONE to keep your name. With the cases I have read so far, they seem very fair and cannot be fooled by big corps. Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy provides that, to justify transfer of a domain name, a complainant must prove each of the following: