NFFC - 9:36 am on Oct 3, 2000 (gmt 0)

Well to avoid this turning into a private thread I'll bow out with this post, there are others *far* more knowledgeable than me waiting to contribute.

>I take the first part of your post, NFFC, as an example of how spammers think

It is difficult for some web site owners to understand how an SE works, they all think that their sites are the most relevant. I get comments such as "but my prices are cheaper than theirs, why should the other site rank better".

This bring us to what I think should be your ultimate concern, stopping spam. We all may have different definitions of spam, but my point is that it doesn't matter weather it is cloaked spam, dupe doorways or anything else spam is spam. If you go the route of singling out cloaked domains for special attention the danger is that you in some way make it easier for spam to "slip" through.

>I do not agree with you regarding Flash..That's another challenge

It was a rant after all. The challenge shouldn't be yours, that cost should be borne by the web site owners if they want to be listed well at your SE.