ceestand - 8:51 pm on Aug 10, 2007 (gmt 0)

Maybe I am reading the decision incorrectly, but to me, it seems that "vertical price restraints" were always legal provided they did not violate section 1 of the Sherman Act. Whether or not they were in violation was to be decided by the "rule of reason".

This doesn't change anything, it just means that PSKS is out of luck. Future price restraints would still be subject to the same scrutiny they always have been.