wheel - 12:16 pm on Apr 5, 2010 (gmt 0)
Another way you could look at it is that this editor determined you were a spammer and simply removed all of your listings. I can understand the logic from that side.
Really? What about my sites that were removed that were approved by another editor and listed prior to my becoming an editor?
DMOZ has a meta-editor complain section. I detailed the complaints there. It was 'resolved' in less than 24 hours. And by resolved, what they did was set the status of the complaint to resolved and did nothing else.
It would seem that in the cases where the editors aren't corrupt, then they're fanatics. Which is worse.
I'll stick to paid directories in the future thank you very much.