hutcheson - 1:29 pm on Oct 2, 2007 (gmt 0)

>>Resubmitting again while it is waiting means it is now tagged as a recent submission, not as one that has been waiting for a long time.

>Wouldn't that leave the door open for competitors to keep submitting a competing site to keep it at the end of the submission list? Are there protocols in place to guard against this?

No. You see, editors don't EVER _have_ to look at suggestions in any order.

>>already been rejected as unlistable, ~ keep resubmitting it ~ gain a reputation as a "pest" ~ future stuff ~ dumped without being considered at all.

>Again, would this not leave the door open for competitors to bury a suite of site owned by the same person, some of which may be quite eligible, but resubmitting a known unlistable site? Are there any protocols in place to guard against this?

I don't know why you'd want to stuff your OWN reputation as a site submitter, just on the off-chance that an editor will look for unsuggested but unlistable sites "similar to" a suggested site, AND won't notice the other sites are actually listable, AND will take the time to document that they are unlistable. But if that's what you want to do, I'm not going to set up a protocol to stop you.