---- Directory Lists that Rank Directories: Good Stuff or Fluff?
stever - 7:06 am on Oct 11, 2006 (gmt 0)
Now that I've suggested that I have some doubts about the state of "directory ranking" allow me to ask a question: Taking anyone's personal, hierarchical list of the #2, #3, etc. directory: "What is the criteria that you apply to place - to rank - a directory in a #2, #3, etc. position"? What is the criteria that you apply?
I take it that you are opening this question to all-comers, and not just those SEM bloggers "sitting in their underwear" that you appear to have been reading...
1) Who would I be surrounded by in the relevant category? 2) How good/bad is the category structure and site architecture? 3) How visible is the directory is my chosen area?
Is it time for the directoryranking dialogue to mature? IF it matures might that reshape where the entire "directory industry" is heading?