jo1ene - 7:18 pm on Feb 17, 2005 (gmt 0)
Well.. what the heck are any of us going to do about it? I do sympathize with DH. There is a "preponderance of the evidence" to support his hypothesis. It does seem that folks with poorly worded, bad format (meaning: obviously did not read the guidelines) and otherwise stupid posts in RZ seem to get what they want before the "rest of us". But you could also make the case for the opposite, I'm sure. I'm sure there's some trick to being accepted. Not meaning anything uncouth, mind you. But there IS obviously something that they're looking for that DH, I and others haven't figured out yet. And it ain't as simple as grammar and spelling.