Liane - 12:38 am on Apr 8, 2004 (gmt 0) Did anyone follow that? :)
Not that I don't think PR 10 is deserved by DMOZ ... but I am more curious about the possibility that perhaps G needed to replace Y's "previous PR value" in order to balance their data base (in respect to all web sites across the board) and repair the damage done by the drop in PR created by Y's devaluation?
Did anyone follow that? :)