stever - 8:59 am on Apr 5, 2003 (gmt 0)

>Whew, pretty heated discussion here.

Fuelled, in no small part, by a deft intervention from a Moderator.

>So why are all of these editors who haven't even looked at the site coming to the defense of the one editor who did?

Because they understand his reasoning? As far as I can see, it doesn't have anything to do with the motive of the site, despite the red herrings thrown around...

Since we (rightly) can't see the site here, and since it doesn't appear that it will become visible elsewhere, we are left with imagining a small site related to the health industry with half pages of affiliate links applying to a category filled with high-quality and authoritative sites (go and check the category).

Setting aside our pro- and anti-ODP stances, do you think most of the sites of this style and content that you have seen on the web before are ODP-guidelines compliant? And therefore do you think it is likely that this one is?