Page is a not externally linkable
ronin - 11:40 pm on Jan 16, 2007 (gmt 0)
How much an employee of a charity is paid is of no consequence. It is how much money they can raise for the charity minus the cost of hiring them that is of importance to the charity. If the charity can raise an extra five million (they wouldn't otherwise be able to raise) by hiring someone for a million and they can't get that person to join them if they pay any less, why wouldn't the charity do so? Wikiseek sounds like it might have the potential to be like the Google of 1998. (Remember that?!) On the other hand, it might be the final nail in Wikipedia's coffin.
<offtopic> how would you feel about an employee of a "charity" being paid a salary of 1m sterling per annum?
</offtopic>