the_nerd - 9:30 pm on Dec 23, 2006 (gmt 0)

I like the idea of human-rated pages. But let's do some math: * say there are 10,000,000,000 web pages * for a page to be rated reliably, at least 5 ratings are required * a page needs to be rated at least once a year * one person can rate 100 pages per day, 300 days per year.

he doesn't have to rate pages - he can rate sites. And then maybe 2000 people could do the trick.

But: there's money in the game, so there will be many woolves out there pretending to be goats - and make sure their sites don't "suck".