g1smd - 6:10 pm on May 23, 2011 (gmt 0)

If said "celebrity" had kept his ***** in his pants then none of this would have happened.

I find it repugnant that people who are in the public eye, and who have zero discretion or morals, think they can do what they like without consequences - and then try to use the law to protect whatever they have done from the public gaze, by taking out a "superinjunction".

The UK legal system has better things to be doing than stopping newspapers printing "who is doing who" and who is "paying for services rendered" all supposedly without the wife knowing.