incrediBILL - 1:49 am on May 21, 2012 (gmt 0)
In a sense that is exactly the opposite of security and if you're prone to being influenced it's dangerous.
Ah ha. Now we're getting somewhere.
Trying to protect the easily influenced, which is a good thing.
However, nobody really protects them from phishing, spam or cons on the phone which is a real threat to privacy, identity and bank accounts opposed to FB knowing they might be prone to buy a cup of coffee if you offer them a coupon.
This lawsuit is all about money, not privacy or helping people, or the dollar amount wouldn't be so large.
The purpose is to help themselves to deep pockets and use public outrage as the gateway to accessing it.