nigassma - 1:14 am on Jun 1, 2010 (gmt 0)
So you're saying WW would be responsible for a user who uses another's image without their permission? I cannot remember ever an instance where a forum was sued over an avatar.
When you upload a photo to facebook, they cover their rear like this:
You can upload up to 200 photos per album.
I figure if Facebook can get away by simply having that on their upload page, WW could do the same.
And for those of you who are offended by the thought that this site would consider avatars, do you simply not use forums that have avatars? Do you not use the Wordpress forums? Do you not use digg?