Webwork - 6:25 pm on May 27, 2010 (gmt 0)

ken_b, what defines or separates godlike from non-godlike moderation?

As best I can articulate what I'm after in starting this thread is that it should focus on what defines a good moderator or good moderation.

I know there's a lot to either hate or rub people the wrong way, when it comes to humans acting as moderators. I think I've read a fair bit of "that feedback".

What I'd like, as a take-away, is everything that everyone has to offer about "how it's done right", be that personality traits, behaviors, mannerisms, practices, etc.

What makes a good mod a good mod?

When you either see or are subject to moderation what makes YOU say:

"That's moderation done right."