martinibuster - 7:34 pm on Nov 28, 2011 (gmt 0)
Wikipedia has no problems ranking on commercial terms
Depends on how you define a commercial term. Is fishing lures a commercial term? It has a commercial component to it, but it's not a commercial term. This is why wikipedia ranks for that phrase.
Cheap Fishing Lures is a commercial term. The word cheap is an explicit clue that the query is commercial in nature because it is about price.
I am not doubting that you are referencing a true commercial term. I am simply stating that we sometimes think certain phrases are commercial when in fact they are not. Yes, I agree that a certain percentage of those making these queries have commercial intent, but there are many others who do not have that intent. That is when you are going to see wikipedia rank and why you see it ranking there.