Mach2 - 12:38 pm on Jul 23, 2009 (gmt 0)

Hi everydoby!

The topic is realy interesting, because we can see that there are no conclusions yet! Even inside the SEO/Webmasters comunity...

A coleague above has tested and, for him, the rel=nofollow exclusion was not interesting. On the other hand, there is the Matt Cutts information.

So, the conclusion I can take is:

- old time rel=nofollow aplyied and that are working, should be left.

- new websites or "not rel=nofollow PR sculped yet" websites should not have this "technique" adopted.

- For posts and user manipulated insertions, IŽd use nofollow to avoid spam.

- Content external link, in my vision, would be rel=nofollow free. Exception for specific cases, as competitors etc.

Any change, any inclusion or even any exclusion for you?

Feel free to change, because I see this topic will be the directive for rel=nofollow use if we could include all our experiences and feelings :)

Bye for now!