Page is a not externally linkable
cnvi - 8:51 pm on Jan 4, 2007 (gmt 0)
First lets discuss about what "natural" means. "Natural" links is thrown around alot but what does it really mean? I'll try to explain by example.. If you use a service that guarantees links and if that service links you to 50 sites every day for 30 days, at the end of that period, you will have exactly 1500 links, is that natural? NO. It would produce a synthetic graph.. a straight line clearly showing the search engines you are up to chicanery. Same thing goes for services that link you to hundreds or thousands of sites in the same day period (or other short term period). Natural means this: you obtained 5 links today, none for the following 4 days, 2 the next day, none the next 4 days, 1 the following day, 8 the following day none the next week, then 1, then none for two weeks, then 7 the next day, and so on.. that would produce a jagged or "natural" low volume graph. Exactly what the search engines want to see. So to answer your question, sure it would be great to obtain exactly 30 links per day but if you actually were able to control 30 webmasters decisions every single day, you would be the big man on campus and I would then suggest you go into the business of building links for everyone.. but thats not realistic is it? It's not realistic to get exactly 30 links a day. More realistic (similar to what martinibuster said a few threads back).. is to ASK/REQUEST 30 links a day. Asking for links and obtaining links are two totally different things. Not all 30 link requests are going to link back. Some will and some won't. That's natural and will not produce a synthetic graph. Why do I keep mentioning "synthetic graph"? Because its specifically noted in Google's 2003 patent: "A sudden growth in the number of apparently independent peers, incoming and/or outgoing, with a large number of links to individual documents may indicate a potentially synthetic web graph, which is an indicator of an attempt to spam" Obviously, you don't want to do anything to show up on a search engine's radar producing a penalization which is why it's important to obtain links naturally with editorial discretion on making links and in slow/natural volume. So to get back to your question... I think you are overthinking this a bit.. Request links as often as you like knowing that many webmasters ignore link requests. It's tough work so unless you are subcontracting the work out to a cheap-labor 3rd party, it's technically impossible to obtain lots of links overnight and on a daily basis unless you found a cure for cancer (or similar newsmaking event). Avoid services that make guarantees on links. If you use software to manage link exchange, make sure you use one that's editor based which makes it impossible to obtain exactly 30 (or insert any number there) links a day. Heres a tip alot of people don't think about.. webmasters are going to make linking decisions based on what they think of your site. If they come to your site and see what looks like a cob-webbed relic, they aren't going to link to your site. If they see your site as a thriving brilliant resource with lots of original information that doesnt exist elsewhere on the web, they are more likely to link to it. In short, don't overthink this too much. Request as many links as you want keeping in mind many will ignore your request (they dont have time for it, or they dont like your site, or they don't think your site is a good match for their users). It's perfectly normal to send out 100 link requests and have only a handful respond favorably. Again, link building success or failure is going to to depend mostly on what other webmasters think of your site which is why link building and content updates go hand in hand.
i can obtain 30 backlink per day, but google want "natural backlinks"