SlyOldDog - 8:09 pm on Feb 14, 2005 (gmt 0)

>>Right, so, wouldn't affiliate links that are only slightly differentiated be even more dangerous to a publisher than straight HTML links that are differentiated?

Why? Affiliate links are relevant :). They are almost guaranteed to be because their location is motivated by money and the hope of a sale.

>>You mean as they appear on the publisher's pages, right? Seems to me that plain HTML links would be a lot harder to distinguish as being part of a link pool than not.

Not if they change with each refresh. Can you think of any other HTML links that rotate like that? I can, but that is spam too :)