Powdork - 8:33 am on Jul 18, 2004 (gmt 0) I should point where you said
you should perhaps have said
It cannot be readable by search engines. It currently is not entirely readable by search engines in it's native form
In many cases I would rather have a great site and pay for the traffic than an okay site with lots of free traffic. I have directories and restaurants and guides and etceteras that rely on engines and do well using html (or the like) with flash logos etcetera. I also have my web design site that uses flash exclusively because I know SE's are not how people find web designers. I also have clients that are not willing to pay for what it takes for proper legitimate SEO, so why not make the site the best it can possibly be for the users and then pay for the traffic. It's just a different model.
They're just different models, different ways of getting to the same end.
I should point where you said