seth_wilde - 7:53 pm on Jul 31, 2000 (gmt 0)

"I did read that document but its amazing how much more understanding I got with a second read"
Tell me about it, I think after about the 5th or 6th read I achieved a moment of clarity and and now I have it pretty much figured out.

I think in that case you wouldn't even include the 1, because 1 x log would = log. I think you would need to just multiply the term frequency with log. (I'll email a friend about this to make sure I'm right)

btw - isn't it log2 not log?

Edited by: seth_wilde