redzone - 6:27 am on Nov 2, 2000 (gmt 0)

James,
AOL Ink. results require a "drill down" on a tabbed link..
Iwon uses a tuned Ink Algo. (You'd better have "bullet proof" link popularity)..

I'm already getting good MSN clicks..

If Yahoo was still using Ink. I might be a big time player in this, but at this point I'm testing the waters with a couple of tests..

My biggest problem with the vendor administering the system, is they have the opportunity to push their other services on companies paying for submission...

If that isn't a biased angle, what is? Read about their other two services, and if they were monitored by the FCC, we'd have the makings of an anti-trust suit starting up. Can you say Microsoft, backwards, three times, real fast...? :)

But like I said, I threw some competitive vertical phrases at them, using my standard Ink. pages, just to see if the algo. is static, and also to see, if we get a little rise, from becoming a paying member of the new order of SE submissions: Paying for the privilege of being listed.. What a joke.....

I agree with a lot of what Brett noted. The only problem is that adult content will get indexed with this system, and now the spammers with deep pockets have an open door, to re-spam Ink from a different angle.... :)