homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.145.183.169
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Pay Per Click Engines
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Pay Per Click Engines Forum

    
Advertising.com's Adlearn Platform
Why would I want to use this over Bidbuddy or Cobra?
Raggle

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3296454 posted 3:44 pm on Mar 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

Hello,

I'm interested to know if anyone has a good understanding between Advertising.com's Adlearn platform and other rules based optimisation platforms such as Bidbuddy and Cobra?

Thanks

 

shorebreak

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3296454 posted 10:07 pm on Mar 29, 2007 (gmt 0)

[NOTE: I'm with an SEM firm that competes with all the firms you're mentioning, so my opinion is quite possibly biased. It's quite possibly right, too.]

BidBuddy = a webified Excel spreadsheet that doesn't appear to be capable of doing anything other than helping you *administer* your PPC campaign. Keyword management systems should work in Google's opaque system, but BidBuddy was built for then-GoTo's transparent auction ($X CPC = position Y). From what I've seen as a competitor displacing them, it simply doesn't work. Why? It doesn't attempt to leverage historical impression/click/cost/revenue/margin data to build accurate data models. It can't accurately estimate the relationship between max CPC, effective CPC and resultant impressions and clicks on Google or Yahoo's new Panama system.

COBRA - Latitude's supposed proprietary keyword management technology. Show me a patent, show me proof of it being something other than [yet] another webified Excel spreadsheet that can't model or accurately estimate traffic or ROI but through pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey trial and error.

AdLearn - there's a reason none of us SEM's compete against Ad.com's search offering: when AOL bought them it wasn't for their keyword mgmt capabilties, but rather for their topline revenue and their banner network optimization. Every single time I've talked to an advertiser who was using Ad.com's PPC mgmt offering, I've heard the same story - they can hit the CPA/margin/COS/ROAS goal, but volume sucks.

If you want solutions that work, keep looking. In the interests of being fair & impartial, the SEM competitors to my firm that I *respect* for their work are:

Performics: not much technology, but they know search and if you're a big enough fish they'll put good work into the marketing/merchandising aspects of your ppc campaign

Aquantive/AveA: same as Performics. They have deep bench strength, good fin'l backing (unlike every SEM whose name starts with 'Search') and have a promising long-term corporate vision

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Pay Per Click Engines
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved