| 6:23 am on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Faxed or emailed copy of drivers license or passport.
Purchase of membership using credit card (warning re: disposable cards holds)
Required to telephone you for activation (or you telephone them)
Verification of name and address with other sources (electoral roll, telephone book, etc.) - no match means manual check
| 6:29 am on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
vince all these sound ok but the problem will be because i target couple of 100 users daily. how can i check things manually?
fax - not everyone can make copy of passport (kids, people who dont have scanner/camera)
pay $1 with cc - not everyone has cc
send SMS to me? i think thats best solution i found so far. what do you think?
| 8:46 am on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
|send SMS to me? i think thats best solution i found so far. what do you think? |
Would your clients be OK with this? I'm not sure I would. Sending an SMS to them perhaps (with a confirm code) - but again would cost.
Prevent people with the same IP signing up? Although this would prevent anyone on the same LAN from signing up!
| 10:30 am on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
yeah there is no easy solution to this. i cannot limit one person to one IP. there are companies behind firewalls with 1000 employees and only one IP.
would you send SMS if you really want to join the site?
| 11:06 am on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
I wouldn't send you an SMS even if there were substantial benefits to me in doing so. I don't own a mobile telephone.
| 11:31 am on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
There is perhaps a solution
I did a quick search for "driver license" database
there are a bunch of "pro" that for a fee let you search a whole country DL db
you might try to deal with those guys and figure how you could query their DB.
Will your user send you their driver license number?
Then you could use it as a login access
| 11:36 am on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
I respect what you're trying to achieve, but its almost an impossible task.
First, there's the passive protection, things which require no effort from the user. These are things like making sure there's 1 account to an email addresss, creating algorithms to detect accounts with similar information and flag them for moderation, etc.
Then there's the active type. These can be small charges to cards, SMS codes, etc. Problem being they just add to the registration process and can deter users.
No matter what methods you undertake, people will always find a way of creating more that one account. This is a fact you are just going to have to accept. People can use their friend's phones, cards, etc. The list is endless. People can be very creative when they want something!
As VVV suggested, SMS codes and small card charges would probably be your best bet.
| 1:39 pm on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
drivers licence wont work - lots of visitors will be 15,16,17 yrs old.
>>People can be very creative when they want something!
exactly. thats why i am afraid of! because they will WANT to create more accounts.
>>>As VVV suggested, SMS codes and small card charges would probably be your best bet.
i guess so but not everyone owns a credit card. i guess i will start with checking cookies and other data but then switch to sms as soon as possible.
| 2:35 pm on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Multiple levels of verification; simple cookie / email unique test being good for up to 10 posts, 5 messages and 1 photo; go past that and you need Level 2 Authorisation (SMS or Fax or $1 pre-authorisation)... etc.
| 2:58 pm on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
Maybe if you could state exactly why they would want more than one account we could increase the ideas.
| 3:00 pm on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
StoutFiles has a good point. Could you also explain why you don't want them to have more than one account? Often the best answer to a problem is to widen things out and stop the problem occurring.
| 4:29 pm on Sep 17, 2008 (gmt 0)|
hmmmm your idea is not that bad.