| 11:44 am on Jan 14, 2009 (gmt 0)|
For a site like you describe I doubt that there would be anything to be gained from using sub directories other than using the names of the directories for keywords?
| 12:43 pm on Jan 14, 2009 (gmt 0)|
O.k thanks, how about if the site got to be hundreds or thousands of pages? I plan to add lots more content. One reason I have used subdirectories is that categories may change while in the early stages.
| 1:39 pm on Jan 14, 2009 (gmt 0)|
one common way of structure is indeed:
it helps in that it gets your category names into the uri, which helps visitors and google alike.
one problem with this is of course when an item is in more than one category, or subcategory.
my own view is that for growth then using subdirectory folders makes things easier to manage in the future ....
although remmeber, especially if you are on linux, that very often these folders, don't actually exist they are rewritten using .htaccess
so that the page:
actually is actual resolved to:
| 2:11 pm on Jan 14, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for that topr8.
I will probably start using sub directories when the site grows a bit and I can see the structure a bit better. I am not able to use .htaccess on this site which is one reason I haven't used sub directories.
| 11:01 am on Jan 15, 2009 (gmt 0)|
Once, in my ignorance, I bought a domain name from a company that used frames for forwarding. To be able to publish addresses for deep links I ended up with a sub directory for every topic (between 1 and 3 pages each).
Idon't know what it did for SEO but I found that it made management a lot easier. Now that the domain is set up properly I have stuck with this structure for additional topics.