| 11:08 am on Sep 21, 2011 (gmt 0)|
I hope they go on an acquisition spree for this ;)
| 1:30 pm on Sep 21, 2011 (gmt 0)|
I'm glad they have their own plan.
| 2:13 pm on Sep 21, 2011 (gmt 0)|
well atleast they know better then to try to out goog them, cause that won't work.
| 3:51 pm on Sep 21, 2011 (gmt 0)|
I'm shocked they even have a plan!
I thought they were just slinging mud at the wall and looking to see what stuck
| 7:21 pm on Sep 21, 2011 (gmt 0)|
Worst thing going for them is the MSFT stigma imo.
| 8:23 pm on Sep 21, 2011 (gmt 0)|
A product or three that bans/blocks Google beacons and data gathering activities would be a breath of fresh air, it's gotten too intense of late, at least for my liking.
| 9:34 pm on Sep 21, 2011 (gmt 0)|
Remind me when was the last time Microsoft changed something fundamentally
| 2:39 pm on Sep 23, 2011 (gmt 0)|
They need to exploit Google's weaknesses not take them on directly. If MS can cut the stupid number of ads and other cr~p on their SERPS, spend their advertising money on convincing Jo Public that Bing really does provide true results that are not paid for for then they will make some headway.
The public are not even aware that they are being shafted by Google. If MS can convince them that is the case and MS are different then it's possible they can win the game.
| 4:23 pm on Sep 23, 2011 (gmt 0)|
If MS can convince them that is the case and MS are different then it's possible they can win the game.
you mean more of this?
| 8:44 pm on Sep 24, 2011 (gmt 0)|
Yes, it's an uphill fight for MS because of their reputation over the last couple of decades.
But money spent on advertising that concentrates on Bing as the good boy versus Google as the bad boy may well pay dividends.
Being realistic, Jo Public doesn't even realise that Bing is owned by MS. In their eyes its Bing versus Google.
| 12:31 am on Sep 25, 2011 (gmt 0)|
well, one hopes that does not mean filing their serps with their own product like the other blokes do,