Rlilly
msg:4195609 | 3:19 pm on Sep 2, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Yes there is an update. It seems like they just messed up. Why would they make so many changes when everyone was saying how good the results where.
|
sjgreatdeals
msg:4195640 | 4:24 pm on Sep 2, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Very bad, looks like they took a very big step back after moving up. Def not liking what im seeing they changed everything
|
textex
msg:4195671 | 5:25 pm on Sep 2, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Looks like a great improvement to me. Seeing lots of fluff content sites gone.
|
jessicalh
msg:4195686 | 5:43 pm on Sep 2, 2010 (gmt 0) |
What kinds of changes are you noticing?
|
Eugenius
msg:4195843 | 12:00 am on Sep 3, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Rankings for one of our most competitive keyword jumped up 26 spots. Still trying to figure out what happened.
|
Rlilly
msg:4196215 | 6:40 pm on Sep 3, 2010 (gmt 0) |
I see what looks like the old Google data center push happening with Bing. Results changing and then eventually settleing down. They look a lot better now that when I first commented.
|
Garya
msg:4196416 | 6:33 am on Sep 4, 2010 (gmt 0) |
For me the results are worse then before, found 3 spam sites on the first page. One has 50 links on the home page and no other content except a domain name that matches the keyword.
Other one is a UK site that does not belong there at all.
Kind of looks like they are blending in some yahoo content from before, looks bad
|
textex
msg:4197308 | 9:47 pm on Sep 6, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Results were looking very clean...and then got cluttered with the article, content fluff sites. Garbage...
|
mrguy
msg:4197780 | 3:34 pm on Sep 7, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Results look fantastic for the things I search for. Much better than Google's results for the same stuff.
|
ember
msg:4202230 | 3:52 pm on Sep 15, 2010 (gmt 0) |
Just got a #2 ranking under a highly competitive keyword for an old site that is rarely updated and very out of date. Odd. But really good. I wonder how long it will last?
|
|
