incrediBILL
msg:3965303 | 1:19 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0) |
My sites are completely NOARCHIVE across the board. Just checked BING and they were not cached. Mine is in all caps, could BING be partially case sensitive? ;) <meta name="ROBOTS" content="NOARCHIVE">
|
Brett_Tabke
msg:3965365 | 2:39 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0) |
seems to be working here a-ok
|
olias
msg:3965430 | 3:57 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0) |
| I've noticed Bing is ignoring <meta name="robots" contents="noarchive"> in some cases. |
|
Just in case that tag was copy & pasted out of some code, thought I should point out that I believe it should be content="" and not contents=""
|
pageoneresults
msg:3965504 | 5:24 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0) |
| thought I should point out that I believe it should be content="" and not contents="" |
|
Uh-hum, that might cause some inconsistency. I'm with IncrediBILL, we NoArchive and block ia_archiver by default. I really dig how clean the SERPs look without the cache links. And, I have this sneaky suspicion that the NoArchive forces an "always fresh" set of SERPs. ;)
|
Rosalind
msg:3965652 | 8:54 pm on Aug 4, 2009 (gmt 0) |
Thanks Olias. It's amazing what can get missed when it's hiding in plain sight. I'm glad the snafu was mine and not Bing's, anyway.
|
|
