sandyk20
msg:3719228 | 3:04 pm on Aug 9, 2008 (gmt 0) |
great step ahead :-) lets try
|
incrediBILL
msg:3719459 | 9:50 pm on Aug 9, 2008 (gmt 0) |
The tools are a little spartan compared to what Google offers. The only surprise was when Live claimed my site had 631,000 backlinks. That's about 3.5x more than Yahoo claims, hmmmm....
|
Whitey
msg:3719506 | 11:38 pm on Aug 9, 2008 (gmt 0) |
It's a great step , but I question who will use it if only a small % of search is performed on Live. Webmaster's time is stretched as it is.
|
BillyS
msg:3719551 | 1:59 am on Aug 10, 2008 (gmt 0) |
Live.com is a fiasco. Their forum is a joke and their tools are nothing more than queries you can run on their search site. They think our site has 12,000 pages (we have 1,200). When asked why we don't even rank for our own site's name (which is not a common term) they tell me it's the competition. I've heard that when the folks at Google want a good laugh they switch to Live.com
|
night707
msg:3719562 | 2:39 am on Aug 10, 2008 (gmt 0) |
live.com is only crawling crawling crawling crawling crawling crawling crawling crawling crawling crawling their webmastertools ..... nothing but a waste of time
|
CainIV
msg:3719580 | 4:01 am on Aug 10, 2008 (gmt 0) |
Excellent. Whether or not I use Live.com makes no difference - these are more metrics and statistics we can use
|
maximillianos
msg:3719582 | 4:04 am on Aug 10, 2008 (gmt 0) |
If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?
|
centime
msg:3719769 | 1:09 pm on Aug 10, 2008 (gmt 0) |
i like the tools, hope we get more functionality as time goes on.
|
petra
msg:3720266 | 1:09 pm on Aug 11, 2008 (gmt 0) |
At least they're trying!
|
|
