msndude
msg:3108923 | 11:11 pm on Oct 4, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Yes, we treat it as equivalent to NOCACHE.
|
lmo4103
msg:3109078 | 2:35 am on Oct 5, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Please read carefully <meta name="robots" content="noarchive"> msnbot documentation only specifies <meta name="msnbot" content="noarchive"> Answer definitively whether msnbot obeys <meta name="robots" content="noarchive"> or not. Thank you.
|
lmo4103
msg:3110906 | 12:54 pm on Oct 6, 2006 (gmt 0) |
Shall I assume that msndude has effectively said: | Yes, msnbot does obey <meta name="robots" content="noarchive">. |
|
?
|
encyclo
msg:3112595 | 1:03 am on Oct 8, 2006 (gmt 0) |
| Answer definitively whether msnbot obeys <meta name="robots" content="noarchive"> or not. |
|
Yes, msnbot obeys noarchive as in your example in the same way as Google and Yahoo.
|
|
