homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.205.189.156
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe to WebmasterWorld

Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Microsoft Corporate
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: bill

Microsoft Corporate Forum

    
Microsoft Criticised By U.S. Ad Industry Over Default Do Not Track In IE10
engine




msg:4503670
 8:56 pm on Oct 3, 2012 (gmt 0)

A U.S.-based organization representing the advertising industry has sharply criticized Microsoft for its decision to enable the Do Not Track feature in a standard installation of Internet Explorer 10, the default browser in Windows 8.

In an open letter to Microsoft published on its website, the Board of Directors of the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) called Microsoft’s decision “shocking” and argued that “Microsoft’s announcement has been uniformly met with outrage, opposition, and declarations that Microsoft’s action is wrong.”Microsoft Criticised By U.S. Ad Industry Over Default Do Not Track In IE10 [zdnet.com]

 

xcoder




msg:4503721
 10:36 pm on Oct 3, 2012 (gmt 0)

Very interesting development.

Questions asked:

1) What if a site owner ignores the "do not track" headers? can he/she be successfully sued ?

2) What does the "do not track" business really mean? are server logs (including user ip, browser plugins, etc.) considered tracking? or is it just the cookie side of things that is the issue?

Huge can of warms...

[edited by: xcoder at 10:40 pm (utc) on Oct 3, 2012]

albo




msg:4503722
 10:36 pm on Oct 3, 2012 (gmt 0)

They argue that Microsoft's decision to leave DNT on will "...harm consumers, hurt competition, and undermine American innovation and leadership in the Internet economy." Reeks of "truth, justice, and the Amercian way" or "Mom and apple pie".

Leosghost




msg:4503727
 10:45 pm on Oct 3, 2012 (gmt 0)

Now I can't get... O Superman..( Laurie Anderson ) out of my head ..:)

incrediBILL




msg:4503768
 12:18 am on Oct 4, 2012 (gmt 0)

1) What if a site owner ignores the "do not track" headers? can he/she be successfully sued ?


Could the bad guys, scrapers and such, which are tracked by many in efforts to block them, turn the table and claim the "do not track" headers apply to them as well?

FWIW I think MS is within their rights to ship the browser with max security on and let the user decide how much to disable. They're protecting the technically challenged that don't know about "do not track" and there are many.

bill




msg:4503780
 12:46 am on Oct 4, 2012 (gmt 0)

The ad industry has deluded itself into believing that without these tracking metrics they can't provide value to their clients.

Marshall




msg:4503815
 3:18 am on Oct 4, 2012 (gmt 0)

Personally, I am against anything that defaults to 'on' when purchased/installed, emphasize purchase. And how does this affect 'society' as a whole. Mountain out of a mole hill if you ask me.

Marshall

blend27




msg:4505460
 2:18 pm on Oct 8, 2012 (gmt 0)

Most Americans have not heard of "Do Not Track," a proposal to allow Internet users to exercise more control over online advertising. However, when probed, most prefer that Do Not Track block advertisers from collecting data about their online activities. This is a much more privacy-protective approach for Do Not Track than what has been proposed by the advertising industry.


Recent survey from Berkeley posted on [papers.ssrn.com...]

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Microsoft Corporate
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved