homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.235.255
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Microsoft Corporate
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: bill

Microsoft Corporate Forum

    
Bing, The Costly Distraction For Microsoft
engine




msg:4343996
 11:09 am on Jul 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

Bing, The Costly Distraction For Microsoft [nytimes.com]
Microsoft needs to concentrate on a different kind of search: finding a buyer for Bing, its online search business. Bing is the industry’s distant No. 2 after Google. It has become a distraction for the software giant — one that costs shareholders dearly. The division that houses Bing lost $2.6 billion in the latest fiscal year. Facebook, or even Apple, might make a better home for Bing. A sale would be a boon for Microsoft’s investors.


 

StoutFiles




msg:4344009
 11:56 am on Jul 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

I was under the impression that Bing was supposed to collect information for MSoft, to use in other products, similar to what Google does?

engine




msg:4344014
 12:49 pm on Jul 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

I think you have to read these suggestion with a pinch of salt. As you say, how much would all that valuable data cost to acquire.

scooterdude




msg:4344033
 1:38 pm on Jul 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

i sincerely hope Microsoft continues to ignore such commentary,

Might well be like wondering Why Amazon backers didn't give up on the company in the bad years

J_RaD




msg:4344045
 2:26 pm on Jul 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

facebook or apple might make a better home for bing?

ha ok I won't even bother clicking the link to read the full article.

superclown2




msg:4344068
 2:54 pm on Jul 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

How do you lose that sort of money running a search engine? It must take real genius.

Jon_King




msg:4344080
 3:14 pm on Jul 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

Seems to me the writer has a lack of vision. Those that invest in long term projects often get railed over short term profit.

Stevo




msg:4344325
 3:52 am on Jul 27, 2011 (gmt 0)

Data centers on the scale of Google and Bing to serve search are very expensive. Even so I don't understand a 2.6 billion dollar loss?

koan




msg:4344329
 4:09 am on Jul 27, 2011 (gmt 0)

How do you lose that sort of money running a search engine? It must take real genius.


Maybe all those deals Microsoft do at a costly price with other companies just to gain market share and be a player in the search engine world.

MWpro




msg:4344331
 4:25 am on Jul 27, 2011 (gmt 0)


Data centers on the scale of Google and Bing to serve search are very expensive. Even so I don't understand a 2.6 billion dollar loss?


I assumed that a lot of this was from Bing's advertising campaigns?

Sgt_Kickaxe




msg:4344844
 5:32 am on Jul 28, 2011 (gmt 0)

That many visitors and they couldn't turn a profit? Yikes.

I suspect it's more a case of 'didn't want to turn a profit' given how monetized their results are. The question is what did they spend those billions on?

J_RaD




msg:4345012
 2:58 pm on Jul 28, 2011 (gmt 0)


I assumed that a lot of this was from Bing's advertising campaigns?


yea they've been doing lots of product placement in TV / movies.


Data centers on the scale of Google and Bing to serve search are very expensive. Even so I don't understand a 2.6 billion dollar loss?


what about building NEW and expanding as well.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Microsoft Corporate
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved