homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.62.226
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Microsoft Windows OS (XP/NT/Vista/Windows 7/8/9/10)
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: bill

Microsoft Windows OS (XP/NT/Vista/Windows 7/8/9/10) Forum

    
Vista is more secure than Linux or OS X
6 Month Vulnerability Report
bill

WebmasterWorld Administrator bill us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3378739 posted 12:21 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

Windows Vista - 6 Month Vulnerability Report [blogs.csoonline.com]

The results of the analysis show that Windows Vista continues to show a trend of fewer total and fewer High severity vulnerabilities at the 6 month mark compared to its predecessor product Windows XP (which did not benefit from the SDL) and compared to other modern competitive workstation OSes (which also did not benefit from an SDL-like process).

This is a report by a Microsoft employee which will surely raise all sorts of instantaneous doubt from those who don't bother to download and read the full report.

Could it be possible that Vista is more secure than these other operating systems?

 

Compworld

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3378739 posted 2:04 am on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

Lol. This is like an environmental report sponsored by the Oil companies. Complete BS.

hawkerz

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3378739 posted 1:08 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

Agreed. I can tell everyone that my company is the best company there is and has the best prices and is the most friendly and accomodating and the best to our employees. I could write a 400 page report about how fantastic my company is. Does this make it true?

Nope.

shigamoto

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3378739 posted 1:20 pm on Jun 26, 2007 (gmt 0)

I browsed through the report, it's really a big difference between Vista/XP and RedHat. The difference between Vista and Ubuntu is smaller though.

As far as I know the report did not state how long it took Microsoft/RedHat/Ubuntu to correct the security errors once they were discovered.

It might be the case that Vista is more secure when it comes to vulnerabilities than the other operating systems in the report. Or fewer problems were discovered in Vista, but they are still lurking around.

Anyhow security isn't only about number of vulnerabilites during the first six months of use.

Compworld

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3378739 posted 4:09 am on Jul 1, 2007 (gmt 0)

As Mac users grow, I would suspect viruses and exploits will become a problem. I think their percentage of users is now up to around 7%. Compared to just a few years ago it was 2%. As you can see, there is certainly growth there. Linux is another issue. Until it becomes more user friendly and widely supported, the security issues would be minimal. If Apple drops the ball, they will have the same problems as MSFT.

EliteWeb

WebmasterWorld Senior Member eliteweb us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3378739 posted 4:15 am on Jul 1, 2007 (gmt 0)

Could be because nobody has 'upgraded' ;)
Actually its more interesting with the amount of virus protection methods implemented.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Microsoft / Microsoft Windows OS (XP/NT/Vista/Windows 7/8/9/10)
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved