homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.113.249
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Search Engines / Local Search
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: anallawalla & bakedjake

Local Search Forum

    
Wikimedia Foundation Launches Wikipedia Nearby (Beta)
engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month Best Post Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4579382 posted 10:16 am on May 30, 2013 (gmt 0)

We are happy to announce that the Wikimedia Foundation mobile team has been working on a Nearby page to surface this information. Along with the goal of bringing awareness of the surrounding areas to our existing readers, we hope that this simple tool can attract new editors to these articles, whether it is to update the information on the exhibits in a local museum, or simply to add a photo of a nearby park that is in severe need of a properly licensed lead image.Wikimedia Foundation Launches Wikipedia Nearby (Beta) [blog.wikimedia.org]

 

Leosghost

WebmasterWorld Senior Member leosghost us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4579382 posted 10:29 am on May 30, 2013 (gmt 0)

Well, that will nicely wipe out all the "local events and life" sites, and the "local and specialised tourism" ones..and the "what's ons"..in fact any small sites about an area, will now have their content added to "nearby" by "editors" ( whether they like it or not ) and thus into Google's knowledge graph..which "finds things" on wikipedia..

jimbeetle

WebmasterWorld Senior Member jimbeetle us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4579382 posted 3:13 pm on May 30, 2013 (gmt 0)

Not sure how it got my location so close from a desktop, but it's spot on.

Kind of limited, only returns 27 results for me.

Leosghost, not sure if it will do all that. If it only draws from Wikipedia, which it appears it does, then only content that is encyclopedic in nature should be returned. Guess we'll have to see in what direction this grows.

Leosghost

WebmasterWorld Senior Member leosghost us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4579382 posted 3:44 pm on May 30, 2013 (gmt 0)

I'm thinking that the fact that they are asking for "new editors to these articles" ..means they are going to get new editors from each local area..who may well not create their own texts or images..but will ( as unfortunately many wikipedia editors do ) "find" what they need on independent "local websites"..and use it to write their wiki "nearby" pages ( or to embellish the existing wikipedia ones )..and wikipedia outranks any site on the same subject..

inbound

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4579382 posted 4:30 pm on May 30, 2013 (gmt 0)

Re the "borrowing" of content, I can see the potential problem but Wikipedia has clear guidelines on what it is and what it isn't. I don't see the majority of local data qualifying as belonging in Wikipedia - but it could change or branch in some way in the future.

In reality it's quite likely that a good proportion of points of interest will have official information/descriptions available on a bespoke website or on a central government/council/tourism site. Also, Wikipedia is supposed to be subjective - so you should not see opinions through the nearby page; that's an area where local guide sites can differentiate themselves.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Search Engines / Local Search
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved