homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.227.40.166
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Search Engines / Local Search
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: anallawalla & bakedjake & inbound

Local Search Forum

    
Are Google+ reviewers likely to be sorted as "Most helpful"?
Panthro




msg:4463268
 4:57 am on Jun 9, 2012 (gmt 0)

I've not taken the time to do a scientific study on this yet, but when searching across niches on Google Local, it seems that reviews from Google+ users are most likely to appear first on the list when sorted for "Most helpful".

I'm sure Google policy has its ideas about why a review from a verified Google+ user should always be listed first when available, but IMHO these are not always the most useful. In at least some cases, these "most helpful" reviews were not voted most helpful either, under the old Google Places format.

Maybe you all can share your observations?

 

anallawalla




msg:4467457
 3:55 am on Jun 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

I don't know how "most helpful" can be computed algorithmically, but Google is trying to tell us that someone who passes the Google+ verification process is to be trusted more than a review on a third-party site.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Search Engines / Local Search
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved