jastra
msg:3963262 | 6:03 pm on Jul 31, 2009 (gmt 0) |
OK, would anybody care to try an educated guesstimate? Thanks for anybody's input.
|
inbound
msg:3963474 | 1:11 am on Aug 1, 2009 (gmt 0) |
It's hard to say - given that it's data that Google controls. I can say that a good proportion of people still click on organic listings; probably still well over 80%. Sorry that I don't have a better answer.
|
jastra
msg:3963743 | 5:19 pm on Aug 1, 2009 (gmt 0) |
Hmm. I wonder if it's as high as 80% to the organic. Especially when a "10-pack" can put the organic SERPs below the fold. Then of course you'd have to calculate in the clicks on the Adwords ads. Thanks for the reply.
|
inbound
msg:3964192 | 3:43 pm on Aug 2, 2009 (gmt 0) |
I should clarify that the 80% is meant to be 80% of what it was before the 10 pack (or any other variant) was there. I estimate this because of the pattern of clicks we have seen as the scope of the 10 pack widens (it has been covering more places and categories over time, and we have identified new searches by the lowering of visitors for those terms in comparison to overall traffic and with the same organic positioning).
|
anallawalla
msg:3966497 | 10:42 pm on Aug 5, 2009 (gmt 0) |
Google doesn't tell its Onebox content provider partners how many impressions occur or how many clicks occur on a onebox listing, so very few people within Google would know that information. Content providers can count how many click through to them. Most of the useful information is available on the "more info" page without needing to click through to the data provider. Therefore any guesses made by the content provider would be unreliable. It would be a good project for the eye-tracking consultants.
|
|
