homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.234.225.23
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

    
Matt Says you should nofollow links in widgets and in infographics
Matt says "I would recommend putting a nofollow, especially on widgets"
jimsthoughts




msg:4601395
 9:48 pm on Aug 12, 2013 (gmt 0)

In Matts video today,
[youtube.com...]
the question asked is
What should we do with embeddable codes in things like widgets and infographics? Should we include the rel="nofollow" by default? ...


Part of Matt's answer is
...I would recommend putting a nofollow, especially on widgets.....depending on your scale of the stuff you're doing with infographics you might consider putting a rel-nofollow on infographic links as well....

 

aakk9999




msg:4601410
 12:33 am on Aug 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

Infographics, widgets, theme footers, press releases...

Basically nofollow links on anything YOU do that can others incorporate/embed/(similar) in THEIR websites that can be done at scale.

So it is not really what it is... it is whether it is/will end up multiple.

martinibuster




msg:4601427
 4:08 am on Aug 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

The no-follow on widgets is understandable. The no-follow on infographics is less apparent but also understandable. The reason is because the citation is not a vote for the site linked in the infographics credit.

A true citation is when a publisher gives a citation/link to your site because they think it is relevant/useful for a specific topic or product.

We discussed in 2009 [webmasterworld.com] why viral link strategies were not a long term strategy. And last year [webmasterworld.com] we discussed why infographics were not a long term strategy for much the same reasons why viral links were not viable.

Aside from build something good and tell others about it, indirect strategies also work well because they encourage actual citations.

adder




msg:4601620
 8:31 pm on Aug 13, 2013 (gmt 0)

It all may sound frustrating but if you actually target link sources that have the right amount of traffic (and most importantly the audience that is interested in your niche) it doesn't really matter that the seed links are nofollowed.

Because on the heavily-trafficked sites, people will come and read your stuff and republish it on their sites. And hopefully some of the links will not carry the nofollow attribute.

Link seeding can work really well if you find the right sites to publish your seed on.

On the other hand, if you're still trying to build the links with the pre-penguin frame of mind (or even worse if your client/boss has the pre-penguin frame of mind) please accept my condolences. Don't pull out all your hair, please!

martinibuster




msg:4605737
 11:53 am on Aug 29, 2013 (gmt 0)

Infographics links, in my opinion, have been flagged as unnatural. Probably should be considered a "use at your own risk" technique.

An infographic link, including so-called "link seeding" is not a vote for specific content on your site. It's republishing duplicate content with a link back to the source. Same as article directories. Infographics are an unnatural link, not a citation.

alika




msg:4620758
 2:01 pm on Nov 2, 2013 (gmt 0)

We added links in our embeds in our infographics and charts that allows users to click easily to the research where the infographics and charts were used. This is the online product of a book produced annually in collaboration with the Wall Street Journal where charts are used extensively

Given Matt Cutt's statement on this, I checked with our $125K a year SEO company if this is a risky strategy. However, we were told that with the high level authority of the site (e.g. our organization's blog is one of Technorati's top 20 politics blogs) and the fact that the link goes back to the relevant resource, that it is ok to do so.

We were told that less "authoritative" websites could suffer, but for sites with higher trust rank, that it's ok to do so.

Should I believe this statement?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved