homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.197.153
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

    
Link removal requests
caran1




msg:4443323
 9:33 am on Apr 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

If you have some blogs with a few articles with links from free services like AMA, how do you deal with link removal requests? Deleting articles or removing links can be very time consuming.

 

martinibuster




msg:4443438
 3:39 pm on Apr 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

Charge a fee for your time to make it worthwhile.

piatkow




msg:4444239
 1:36 pm on Apr 23, 2012 (gmt 0)

I only give links that I am prepared to update if there are changes.

After you have given a free link asking a fee to make changes will make you look like a bit of a con merchant.

caran1




msg:4444294
 3:25 pm on Apr 23, 2012 (gmt 0)

The links were part of articles which were posted to the blogs, by using an automated system. However, there is no automated system to remove the links.

martinibuster




msg:4444329
 5:19 pm on Apr 23, 2012 (gmt 0)

...asking a fee to make changes will make you look like a bit of a con merchant.


I understand your point if it's a one-off a couple times a year to make edits to an address or phone number. That helps the publisher (and their site visitors) as much as the beneficiary of the link and it's not a lot of work. So perhaps that needs to be stated and thanks for stating that.

But in this context it is more intensive than a one-off here and there. The OP states in the first post that the link removal requests are "time consuming". Time is money. Time is a commodity. It's a significant amount of work, so in that context, barring any contractual/legal restriction, the OP can ask for compensation. Everyone is entitled to be paid for their work.

lucy24




msg:4444494
 2:53 am on Apr 24, 2012 (gmt 0)

Everyone is entitled to be paid for their work.

Mmnyeah, but if you're talking about something you got for free in the first place? I may be reading the OP upside-down and sideways, but I make it out to say:

Some articles came from a free and automated service.
These articles contain links.
The entity at the other end of the links wants them removed, and doesn't care if it's done by removing the links or removing the entire article that contains the links.

(I originally read it the other way around-- as links from somewhere else to you-- but couldn't get it to work.)

I would worry about the supplier of free links flagging your client's site as uncooperative and quietly removing it from a few lists.

caran1




msg:4444507
 4:02 am on Apr 24, 2012 (gmt 0)

@lucy24 , can you clarify what you mean by

I would worry about the supplier of free links flagging your client's site as uncooperative and quietly removing it from a few lists.

lucy24




msg:4444547
 7:02 am on Apr 24, 2012 (gmt 0)

Well, it's what I would do. If you go around handing out links, wouldn't you expect some show of appreciation?

Unless, that is, the original link was to SoberAnalysis.edu and they're telling you the target has moved to SuperCheapGizmosForSale.to. Then it really is a case for "I'll try to get that updated within the next year or two."

Now, if you're getting anonymous letters signed "A Friend" letting you know that your .gov links have been quietly redirecting to .su all along...

Oh, never mind.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved