homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.201.65
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

This 32 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 32 ( 1 [2]     
Google Algo Changes March 2012 and Links
Changes to How Links are Handled!
martinibuster




msg:4437334
 4:15 am on Apr 5, 2012 (gmt 0)

With thanks to netmeg for starting the main algo discussion [webmasterworld.com]. I want to bring attention to the updated factors relevant to link development in this discussion. The official Google blog post is here [insidesearch.blogspot.com], please read it because there are some changes there that may affect your link building.

The main algorithm changes reflect what many in last months discussion believed was the main thrust of recent changes. Here are the changes relative to link building that were officially announced:

  • Tweaks to handling of anchor text
  • Improvements to processing for detection of site quality.
  • Better interpretation and use of anchor text.


Here are some other changes that could have some effect, but it is debatable at best:

  • Fewer “sibling” synonyms.
  • Better synonym accuracy and performance.
  • Less aggressive synonyms.
  • Remove deprecated signal from site relevance signals.


The synonym parts are probably not link related. But could it be tied to how anchor text is tweaked?

What about the deprecated signal? Was that something affecting PageRank flow?

 

maddawg




msg:4441708
 11:20 pm on Apr 16, 2012 (gmt 0)

All I'm noticing is the algorithm is suddenly really sensitive to unnatural linking, and I get the feeling Google is cross-checking anchor text with other factors to see if your linkbuilding is legit.

If you are building links unnaturally, Google is now assuming your site is low quality and actually dropping your rankings. In the past, low quality links seemed to just be a waste of money in the sense Google did not count them so they did not benefit you. It's like Google is now not only more sensitive to unnatural linking, but they are counting these links against you.

CainIV




msg:4449183
 6:13 am on May 4, 2012 (gmt 0)

If you are building links unnaturally, Google is now assuming your site is low quality and actually dropping your rankings.


Absolutely. They are 5 years late to the game!

This 32 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 32 ( 1 [2]
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved